Defending behavioral science

Defending behavioral science

A couple weeks ago, the New York Times posted an opinion piece which presented a very pessimistic and narrow view of the behavioral sciences. While I agreed with some of the points of the author, particularly the need for more randomized controlled trials of psychosocial interventions, I also think he “threw the baby out with the bathwater.” While we haven’t solved all the problems of humanity through behavioral science research, we have managed to discover a range of interventions that have been shown to work.

In response to the NY Times article, a local colleague and friend at Oregon Research Institute, Tony Biglan, wrote an excellent response. In his post, he outlines some of the research-based intervention that have been shown to work.

In a time of decreasing funding for research and particulary for behavioral research, it’s important that we advocate for the importance of science-based psychotherapy and related psychosocial interventions. If you like this piece, consider passing it on, blogging about it, or tweeting it. There are buttons right at the bottom of this page that make it easy to pass along.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail